[s1mp3-dev] SVN for us was Re: CVS

[Legolas]

No problem Mateus, since TRAC uses SVN we will embrace the future and go 
with Subversion.
<flame>

--
  Legolas

Mateus Del Bianco ha scritto:

>Just Remember that a LOT of projects originally in CVS are migrating to SVN,
>Gallery [http://gallery.menalto.com/] is one of those.
>
>Just to remember, even the linux kernel once made this migration...
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: s1mp3-dev-bounces at s1mp3.org [mailto:s1mp3-dev-bounces at s1mp3.org] On
>Behalf Of Bluechip
>Sent: domingo, 18 de junho de 2006 18:46
>To: S1mp3.org - SWAN development
>Subject: Re: [s1mp3-dev] CVS
>
>
>  
>
>>: I would stick to SVN since it claims to be an "improved" CVS, and
>>: considering its embedding with the future TRAC system, but we could
>>: (painful decision here) use sf.net SVN/CVS meanwhile
>>
>>SVN makes that claim, and has been making that claim for quite some 
>>time.  It has been my experience that either will work well enough for 
>>everybody but huge power users of the SCM system.  We're unlikely to 
>>get to that stage, so I'm agnostic about which one to use.  But please, 
>>let's not add any more choices.
>>    
>>
>
>How about RCS ? ...LOL ...No, only joking! ;)
>
>The features that appeal to me on SVN are the changes in the area of
>tracking file renames (and similar).
>
>Also agnostic as to the final choice between the two options avilable to us,
>
>BC 
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>s1mp3-dev mailing list
>s1mp3-dev at s1mp3.org
>http://s1mp3.org/mailman/listinfo/s1mp3-dev_s1mp3.org
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>s1mp3-dev mailing list
>s1mp3-dev at s1mp3.org
>http://s1mp3.org/mailman/listinfo/s1mp3-dev_s1mp3.org
>
>  
>